Indo-European appears to have had two words for fire, and the distinction they preserved is genuinely interesting: one was grammatically inanimate and one animate — fire as a substance, and fire as a living thing.
From the first comes Greek pŷr and English fire. From the second comes Latin ignis and Sanskrit agni, which are direct cognates. That second word names the fire that receives offerings, the fire that is treated as an agent rather than a material — and it is no accident that it is the one that became a deity in the Vedic tradition.
Arabic nār belongs to the same Semitic root as nūr, light, which appears on the light page — fire and light being one idea in Semitic where Indo-European tends to separate them. Persian āzar and ātash carry the weight of Zoroastrian fire-temples, and names built on them are still borne in the Parsi community of western India.
Fire-names for daughters are less common than light-names by a wide margin, and where they occur they tend to mean warmth, hearth or brightness rather than destruction.